Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account. The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:.
Sorry, something went wrong. Wow, that is a quick answer, I was still investigating myself, it should work indeed looking at this:. I got the idea that the import of the namespace in the second schema is going wrong. Storing it internally DefinitionsReader::loadTypes using the target namespace instead of a key might be an idea? The schema is trying to solve a type that does not exist yet will be loaded in the next iteration.
I was partially aware of the problem and there is some code and strategy to solve it Thanks for diving in to this in this short term! That "multi step parsing" seems a biggie indeed Types are loaded by namespace and name pair, not by path.
This attribute changes the namespacing rules considerably. It is normally easier to set it to qualified. So to see the effects of this property, if we set it to be unqualified in all of our schemas, the resulting XML would look like this:. The first element is Purchase, this is defined globally in the Main.
So it does not need to be aliased. The same is true for all the child elements, they are all defined inline, so they do not need qualifying with a namespace. In the element "Purchase" we just reference it. Namespaces provide a useful way of breaking schemas down into logical blocks, which can then be re-used throughout a company or project.
The rules for namespacing in the resulting XML documents are rather complex, the rules provided here are a rough guide, things do get more complex as you dig further into it. Liquid Studio In This Topic. This means that all entities defined in this schema belong to that namespace:. So in order to make use of the AddressType which is defined in CommonTypes. We can now make use of the types within the CommonTypes. When we do this we must fully qualify them as they are not in the same targetNamespace as the schema that is using them:.
This is our main schema and defines the concrete elements "Purchase", and "CustomerDetails". This element builds on the other schemas, so we need to import them all, and define aliases for each namespace. Note: The element "CustomerDetails" which is defined in main. Let's look at an example:. The first thing we see is the xsi:schemaLocation attribute in the root element.
You have probably noticed that every element in the schema is qualified with one of these aliases. The general rules for this are:. The alias must be the same as the target namespace in which the element is defined.
All files have the same namespace though since the types contained within them are all part of the master schema. If I then try to define one of my other schemas with a different namespace, I'm having difficulty importing multiple xsd files where they all have the same name space.
Its like the editor will only recognise one import statement for a given namespace. It then seems to ignore any other import statements that define the same namespace. Any advice much appreciated. Follow Post Reply. Martin Honnen. I think one schema per namespace that includes the different components of the schema for that namespace and then one import for the main schema per namespace is the right way to go. This discussion thread is closed Start new discussion. Similar topics. NET Framework.
0コメント